Before audiences had access to innumerate voices and professed authority on cinema via the internet, they relied on the thumb gauge of film critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. It might surprise some fans to learn that the passionate pair were journalists, not movie buffs. The non-cinephiles began their movie-reviewing careers as rival critics at Chicago newspapers, with Siskel writing for The Chicago Tribune and Ebert for The Chicago Sun-Times. Though Ebert had loftier career plans, in 1975, he was the first critic to receive the Pulitzer Prize for criticism, sealing his fate.
The unlikely duo became the definitive voices (and thumbs) on whether audiences tuned in or out. They were first featured on PBS from 1975 to 1986 in Opening Soon at a Theatre Near You, followed by a revamped weekly series called Sneak Previews. Frustrated by the overproduced structure of the PBS shows, a more authentic series, Siskel & Ebert became their home base until Siskel died in 1999. Ebert continued to review films alongside guest critics, selecting Richard Roeper as his new co-host in 2000, but the show’s essence was never the same. Here are some hot takes, chaotic pivots, heated disagreements, and cinematic love-fests from the thumbs who started it all.
Sneak Previews
This groundbreaking TV show features film critics Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert reviewing the latest movies. Known for their passionate debates and “thumbs up, thumbs down” ratings, the show influenced generations of moviegoers and set the standard for televised film criticism.
- Release Date
- November 26, 1975
- Cast
- Gene Siskel , Roger Ebert , Jeffrey Lyons , Neal Gabler , Michael Medved , John Iltis
- Main Genre
- Talk Show
- Seasons
- 6
10 ‘Speed 2: Cruise Control’ (1997)
Siskel: Thumbs up, Ebert: Thumbs up
In the sequel to the Keanu Reeves/Sandra Bullock blockbuster Speed, Speed 2: Cruise Control trades an unstoppable city bus for an unstoppable luxury cruise ship. The ocean liner is overtaken by a delusional villain named Geiger (Willem Dafoe), and it’s up to Bullock and her boyfriend, LAPD officer Alex (Jason Patric), to row the boat ashore safely. The movie was a box office dud, grossing $164 million worldwide, barely breaking even.
Both critics thoroughly enjoyed the “ocean liner adventure,” but Ebert noted that he “showed up to see the star” (Bullock) from the first movie. Siskel argued that “there were three stars, Patric, Bullock, and the ship,” and they were all very good. Despite their heated fervor during the review, the sparring critics were surprisingly positive regarding director Jan de Bont‘s action movie. The Cruise Control review hysterically concluded as Ebert held fast to his assertion that the movie needed more Bullock, stating, “My point is still an excellent one.” Shaking his head in disagreement, Siskel clapped back: “Only in your head.”
9 ‘The Silence of the Lambs’ (1991)
Siskel: Thumbs down, Ebert: Thumbs up
At the Boston Psychiatric Hospital for the Criminally Insane, FBI trainee Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) interviews the incarcerated cannibalistic serial killer Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins). Starling is tasked with extracting practical methodology from the mind of one killer to catch an active killer on the loose. The young FBI agent intrigues the silver-tongued Lecter, and a game of cat and mouse ensues.
Siskel was not impressed by Silence of the Lambs. He slams director Jonathan Demme for choosing a “trashy project” and thought Hopkins’ performance was “overplayed.” Ebert praised the film, noting that Starling and Lecter represented “one of the most peculiar and fascinating relationships on film he’s seen in a long time.” Additionally, Ebert praised both Hopkins and Foster’s performances and accused Siskel of “shortchanging the skill and art” that went into the film. Siskel thought Hopkins didn’t need the dramatic score and an organ playing in the background, to which Ebert exclaims, “Gene, this is the movies! What do you want?” Given the opportunity, Lecter would’ve totally eaten Gene.
The Silence of the Lambs
A young F.B.I. cadet must receive the help of an incarcerated and manipulative cannibal killer to help catch another serial killer, a madman who skins his victims.
8 Blue Velvet (1986)
Siskel: Thumbs up, Ebert: Thumbs down
David Lynch‘s neo-noir thriller Blue Velvet stars frequent collaborator Kyle MacLachlan as Jeffrey Beaumont, a man who returns home and finds a severed ear. He joins forces with Sandy (Laura Dern) and begins to spy on a mysterious lounge singer, Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini), who is somehow tied to the ear. Amid Jeffrey’s amateur sleuthing, he encounters Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper), a drug-dealing maniac who answers to no one. Since its release in 1986, Blue Velvet has appeared on numerous ‘Best Films of All Time’ lists but never impressed Roger Ebert.
After referring to the film as a “sick, depraved masterpiece,” Ebert acknowledged Lynch’s talent but said, “The more he thought about Blue Velvet, the less I liked it.” He felt strongly against scenes depicting humiliating sexual scenes, stating that “Rossellini was asked to do what few actresses have been asked before.” Ebert said witnessing Rossellini on-screen pained him, and Lynch’s film was “cruelly unfair to its actors.” Siskel countered by agreeing that Blue Velvet challenges the viewer’s reaction in a good way and that “Rossellini consented to do what she did.” He affirmed that Lynch aimed to play the audience like a piano. Ebert replied, “If somebody’s going to play me like a piano, he better get some music worth listening to.”
Blue Velvet
The discovery of a severed human ear found in a field leads a young man on an investigation related to a beautiful, mysterious nightclub singer and a group of psychopathic criminals who have kidnapped her child.
7 Broken Arrow (1996)
Siskel: Thumbs up before thumbs down, Ebert: Thumbs down
On a secret mission involving stealth bombers, Major “Deak” Deakins (John Travolta) and Captain Riley Hale (Christian Slater) become midair enemies. Deakins hatches a plan to extort the government using B83 warhead missiles, framing Hale in the process. However, Deakins underestimates Hale and his new Park Ranger ally, Terry (Samantha Mathis), as director John Woo releases his trademark doves into the sky.
“I don’t think I’ve done this on this show in 20 years, but I’m going to twist my thumb down.”
Siskel begins his assessment of Broken Arrow by praising Woo’s colorful action scenes, though he admits it gets tedious. Still, Siskel says that he liked the picture for what it was trying to accomplish. Ebert joins the conversation by noting that Travolta was “not convincing as a villain” and “the movie isn’t interesting.” Siskel starts to agree with Ebert, admitting that “it didn’t work” because Travolta is “a sweet guy,” which leads to one of the most remarkable moments in their reviewing history. Siskel says, “I don’t think I’ve done this on this show in 20 years, but I’m going to twist my thumb down.” While Ebert is amazed at the turn of events, Siskel seizes the opportunity to ask Ebert to change his appraisal of Cop and a Half. Not a chance.
6 Jaws: The Revenge (1987)
Siskel: Thumbs down, Ebert: Thumbs down
A hungry great white shark meanders into the shallow waters of Amity Island in Jaws, the 1975 masterpiece by young Steven Spielberg, a prolific visionary and singular talent. After the monumental success and exhilarating thrill of Jaws, several sequels followed. In Jaws: The Revenge, a fourth toothy aquatic beast returns to the shores of Amity Island to finish what began many sharks ago.
Siskel and Ebert have fun poking plot holes and technical errors in their review of the fourth installment of the Jaws films. The renowned film critics weren’t alone in evaluating the movie, as Entertainment Weekly selected Jaws: The Revenge as one of the worst sequels ever made. Siskel amusingly emulated shark-speak via a bizarre plot to murder all members of the Brody family and was so annoyed by a dream sequence that he “wanted to punch a hole in the (film) screen.” However, Siskel and Ebert agreed that the most egregious error was awarded to Michael Caine‘s dry shirt after he had emerged from the water. Ebert offers final commentary with a rapid-fire aquatic conjecture by playing “Which shark is this?” Easily one of their funniest reviews.
Jaws: The Revenge
In the fourth installment of the Jaws series, Ellen Brody believes a great white shark is seeking revenge on her family. When her son is killed, she heads to the Bahamas, where the shark follows, leading to a final, deadly confrontation.
5 ‘She’s Out of Control’ (1989)
Siskel: Thumbs down, Ebert: Thumbs down
While away on a business trip, Doug Simpson’s (Tony Danza) fifteen-year-old daughter, Katie (Ami Dolenz), participates in a glow-up with the help of Doug’s girlfriend. The previously unremarkable teen goes from drab to fab, to her father’s chagrin and everyone else’s delight. As his baby girl turns into a woman seemingly overnight, Doug struggles to maintain composure and refrain from attacking would-be suitors.
“Siskel began the review by declaring
She’s Out of Control
a “depressing experience.” ”
Siskel began the review by declaring She’s Out of Control a “depressing experience.” He further stated that after seeing the movie, he “considered quitting his job as a film critic.” Ebert echoed Siskel’s reaction, adding that “hours of his life had been stolen,” and moviegoers would’ve had more fun conversing in the lobby. Fans of Siskel and Ebert know how greatly the pair care for cinema, and their review and profound disdain for the Danza flick was a wild, unforgettable moment on the show.
4 ‘Fargo’ (1996)
Siskel: Thumbs up, Ebert: Thumbs up
The Coen brothers’ frozen caper, Fargo, stars William H. Macy as anxious car sales manager Jerry Lundegaard, who has amassed an enormous debt he cannot repay. Jerry devises an ill-conceived extortion plot involving the kidnapping of his wife, which backfires like one of the Cutlass Ciera sedans on his father-in-law’s car lot. In a star-making turn, Frances McDormand arrives on the scene as Police Chief Marge Gunderson, proving that you catch more flies– or criminals with mid-western honey.
Ebert begins by gushing about Fargo directly, calling it a “just about perfect” movie. He then continues to praise the film, calling it a “quirky, infectious, American masterpiece.” Both Siskel and Ebert considered Fargo the best film of 1996, with Siskel taking it a step further, citing it as one of his all-time favorites. The enthusiastic critics bubbled with a shared, excited zest reserved for special, agreeable occasions. Fans of the show witnessed Siskel and Ebert’s appreciation for Fargo after its initial release and once again during their “Best Films of 1996” episode. Their disagreements are fun, but their unbridled love of great cinema is a joyous spectacle.
Fargo
Minnesota car salesman Jerry Lundegaard’s inept crime falls apart due to his and his henchmen’s bungling and the persistent police work of the quite pregnant Marge Gunderson.
3 ‘Benji: The Hunted’ (1987)
Siskel: Thumbs down, Ebert: Thumbs up
Like Jaws: The Revenge, Benji: The Hunted is the fourth iteration of the adventurous canine film series. While working on a movie, Benji evades his trainer and ventures into the forests of Oregon. Benji encounters various wildlife species and a trigger-happy hunter during his time lost in the wilderness. Several rescue attempts via helicopter fail to recover the lost pup, but Benji is more invested in caring for a couple of orphaned cougar cubs.
“Audiences might’ve skipped the movie, but the review was immensely entertaining.”
After mocking the movie’s misleading, serious title, Siskel advises audiences to arrive ten minutes late to avoid the brutal slaying of a mother cougar. Ebert counters with a surprising acerbic takedown of Siskel’s take, describing his fellow critic’s review as a “Blasé, sophisticated, cynical review” he would expect from an adult. The problem is that Benji: The Hunted is a children’s movie. Siskel accuses Ebert of “wrapping himself in the flag of children,” which provoked a louder, voracious rebuttal from Ebert, who doubled down on his previous comment regarding Siskel’s critical pretense. Dodging that right hook, Siskel shouted, “Boredom! Boredom, with all the running,” concluding that the film was “garbage.” Ebert remained undeterred, ending the heated Benji debacle by saying, “I think kids will enjoy it.” Audiences might’ve skipped the movie, but the review was immensely entertaining.
2 ‘North’ (1994)
Siskel: Thumbs down, Ebert: Thumbs down
North is a movie about a gifted child named North (Elijah Wood) who decides to divorce his neglectful, unappreciative parents. Following a judgment by the court, North embarks on an adventure to find parental replacements. The movie was a box office disaster and can be found on numerous lists featuring the “Worst Movies Ever Made.”
Ebert referred to North as “one of the most thoroughly hateful movies in recent years,” further stating that the movie “made him cringe just sitting here thinking about it.” He said he “hated this movie as much as any movie we’ve reviewed in the 19 years we’ve been doing this show.” Ebert’s evisceration of the movie didn’t end there: he listed all the ways he hated the movie, including director Rob Reiner‘s contribution, calling North “an aberration in his career.” Siskel is in Ebert’s corner, referring to the film as “deplorable” and its use of ethnic stereotyping as “appalling and embarrassing.” Siskel goes as far as to say that audiences “feel unclean” watching the film and that “it’s junk. First-class junk.” Yikes. Please tell us how you really feel, guys.
North
Sick of the neglect he receives from his mom and dad, a young boy leaves home and travels the world in search of new parents.
1 ‘Hoop Dreams’ (1994)
Siskel: Thumbs up, Ebert: Thumbs up
Hoop Dreams is a 1994 documentary chronicling the lives of two inner-city boys from Chicago, William Gates, and Arthur Agee, over five years as they attempt to fulfill their dreams of becoming NBA players. Though the film runs nearly three hours, there are over two hundred forty-seven hours of unused footage audiences would line up to see. Free-throw shots have never been so compelling.
Following a special preview screening, Siskel opened the January 22, 1994, review by imploring audiences to consider a documentary called Hoop Dreams. Siskel’s enthusiastic recap of the film, which he called “very special,” is a winning endorsement. Ebert builds on Siskel’s zeal by declaring it “one of the best films about American life” he’s ever seen. The palpable excitement emanating from the famous critical duo during their initial Hoop Dreams report is partly responsible for the documentary’s buzz. When Siskel and Ebert unveiled their unanimous choice for the best film of 1994, they went against scores of critics who had selected popular films like Pulp Fiction, The Shawshank Redemption, and Forrest Gump. The pair didn’t always get it right, but their blessing of Hoop Dreams was a slam dunk.
Hoop Dreams
Hoop Dreams is a documentary that follows the lives of two African-American teenagers, William Gates and Arthur Agee, from Chicago as they pursue their dream of becoming professional basketball players. The film captures their struggles with family, education, and the harsh realities of inner-city life, highlighting the profound impact of sports on their futures.
Source link